Search by Category:

Four new partners at Sharpe Pritchard

London-based public law specialist, Sharpe Pritchard, has promoted four lawyers to the partnership.

Aidan Dickinson, Gemma Duncan, Gemma Townley and Peter Collins are all now partners of the firm.

Their promotions strengthen the firm’s real estate development, compulsory purchase, corporate, and ICT and data offerings.

Aidan Dickinson is a real estate lawyer specialising in compulsory purchase matters. He

Continue reading

Recovering the cost of adjudication

Authors: Justin Mendelle and Tola Odedoyin

Update

After the 2016 judgment in Lulu Construction Ltd (“Lulu”) v Mulalley & Co Ltd, the door on recovering costs in adjudication was ajar. The recent unreported case of Enviroflow Management Limited v Redhill Works (Nottingham) Limited may have closed it.

The issue is how the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996

Continue reading

North Midland Building Limited v Cyden Homes Limited [2017] EWHC 2414 (TCC)

Background

Cyden Homes Limited (the “Defendant”) engaged North Midland Building Limited (the “Claimant”) to design and construct a large house (known as ‘South Farm’) plus outbuildings. The contract used was the JCT Design & Build Contract 2005 with bespoke amendments.

The amendment at issue in this case concerned the extension of time provision where the employer has received notification of

Continue reading

Are you ready for the General Data Protection Regulation?

Data protection anoraks across the European Union (myself proudly included) eagerly awoke on 1 January this year with only one thought in mind: next year the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) will come into effect.  After years of dialogue, tweaking, pondering and waiting, the GDPR will become applicable in the UK on 25 May 2018. Rejoice!  

Although not everyone

Continue reading

Case report – Kilker Projects v Rob Purton (t/a Richwood Interiors) [2016] EWHC 2616 (TCC)

Cases such as ISG v Seevic[1] and Galliford Try v Estura[2] illustrate the problems that can occur when a payer fails to issue the required payment or payless notices. The aforementioned cases established the principle that where, in respect of interim payment applications, there is an absence of the appropriate notices, an adjudicator cannot deal with the issue

Continue reading