020 7405 4600

Accessibility Icon
Samuel Hart

Samuel Hart

Associate

Contact by email

Sam is an experienced litigator and adviser on judicial review and regulatory matters involving both central and local government. Before joining Sharpe Pritchard, Sam gained extensive experience at a leading New Zealand firm, acting as a junior counsel in the Court of Appeal, High Court, and New Zealand’s largest inquiry, the Royal Commission into Abuse in Care.

Sam’s role:

Sam advises on public law, with a focus on energy, environmental, and climate change matters, and regularly handles cases involving judicial review and local government issues. He also supports clients through legislative changes and law reform.

In 2024, Legal 500 recognised Sam as a “key lawyer” for his contribution to high-profile cases and expertise in public law.

What skills or behaviours make you good at your role?

Sam is known for his careful, strategic approach and dedication to understanding his clients’ objectives from the outset. He has a reputation for delivering clear, practical advice in plain English and is highly valued by his clients for his pragmatic outlook and reliability.

  • Central Government
  • Corporate Clients
  • Local Government
  • Advertising Law
  • Emergency Injunctions
  • Environmental Law
  • Judicial review
  • Litigation
  • Natural hazard liability
  • Planning appeals and disputes
  • Procurement
  • Procurement challenges
  • Represented the convener of expert consenting panels in a successful urgent appeal against a High Court ruling, securing a favourable outcome for the client.
  • Successfully defended proceedings involving coal exploration and novel arguments regarding climate change, ensuring continued project development.
  • Successfully defended both urgent interlocutory and substantive proceedings related to allegations of unlawful limitations on the right to refuse medical treatment.
  • Acted on behalf of the Catholic Church in a high-profile, two-year case study focusing on systemic abuse at New Zealand institutions, operational between 1955 and 1993.
  • Represented clients in both the Environment Court and High Court, addressing novel legal points arising from a subdivision dispute.