Read more about: Education providers, In The Press, Judicial review, Litigation, Local Authority, Local government, Press Release, Public law,
22 July 2026
Sharpe Pritchard has successfully represented a local authority in High Court proceedings concerning the closure of a nursery, securing the dismissal of a judicial review brought by a group of parents.
The claim arose following the local authority’s decision to agree to a proposal by the service provider to terminate its service contract early. The claimants sought judicial review of that decision, alongside applications for interim relief preventing the Council from taking further steps in relation to the nursery and a costs capping order.
The High Court dismissed all applications and certified the claim as totally without merit. The Court accepted that the local authority had properly considered the circumstances surrounding the service provider’s position and recognised the commercial realities that had led to the termination of the arrangement.
Sharpe Pritchard’s Jack Trevella and George McLellan instructed Hannah Slarks and Raphael Hogarth of 11KBW, who appeared on behalf of the Council.
Cases involving the closure, reorganisation or withdrawal of public services are often highly sensitive. They can generate significant community concern, media attention and, increasingly, legal challenge.
While every case turns on its own facts, this judgment serves as a reminder that the courts will carefully distinguish between private, contractual decisions of local authorities and those that are amenable to judicial review.
Where local authorities have taken relevant considerations into account and reached decisions in good faith, the courts will be reluctant to interfere, particularly where the background circumstances reflect unavoidable financial or commercial realities.
Sharpe Pritchard regularly advises local authorities and public bodies on judicial review, education law, governance and decision-making. Our team works closely with clients to help ensure that decisions are robust, legally defensible and capable of withstanding scrutiny where challenges arise.
Jack Trevella commented:
“Challenges of this nature can be particularly difficult for councils, as they often involve decisions affecting valued local services and generate strong public feeling. This case highlights the importance of clear decision-making processes, careful consideration of statutory duties and maintaining a robust evidential record throughout.”
For more information about Sharpe Pritchard’s public law, litigation and education law expertise, please contact our team
For all our latest news, insights and events, subscribe to our newsletter.
This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published.
