Search by Category:

Redactions to disclosure in judicial review litigation – a further update

We have written previously on the string of recent cases confirming that in judicial review litigation the duty of candour ordinarily requires the names of junior civil servants to be disclosed in unredacted form when providing disclosure.

In a recent decision – MTA v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Ors [2024] EWHC 553 (Admin) (“MTA”)

Continue reading

Court of Appeal confirms approach to redactions of names of junior civil servants

Court of Appeal confirms approach to redactions of names of junior civil servants

In a unanimous judgment, the Court of Appeal has dismissed the government’s appeal of a High Court judgment which proscribed the government’s practice of routinely redacting the names of junior civil servants when supplying disclosure in judicial review proceedings.

R (IAB and others) v Secretary of State

Continue reading

Update – Redactions in judicial review litigation

In a recent blog (please see here), we examined a judgment of the Administrative Court regarding the approach – in the context of judicial review litigation – to redactions of the identities of officials in disclosed documents. As noted in that blog, the Court, in an authoritative judgment, made clear its view that, in general, a litigant in judicial

Continue reading

Key updates to the Administrative Court Guide

The Administrative Court Guide (the “Guide”) is an important resource for judicial review practitioners. Whilst the Guide does not have the force of law, it is “essential reading for all those who practice in the Administrative Court” (R (DVP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 606 (Admin) [8]). Accordingly, all those engaged in

Continue reading

The 10 commandments? The 10 principles of the duty of candour

Unlike in most civil claims, the parties in judicial review proceedings are usually not required to give standard disclosure, unless the court orders otherwise. However, judicial review proceedings are different. In judicial review litigation, parties are subject to a ‘duty of candour’ which requires them to co-operate and make candid disclosure of the relevant facts and (so far as they

Continue reading

Strike-Breaking Legislation Quashed in Judicial Review

In a major blow to the Government, new regulations which permitted employers to use agency workers to replace those on strike, has been found to be unlawful and so has been quashed, removing it from the statute books.

In the case of R (on the application of ASLEF and  Ors) v the Secretary of State for Business and Trade,

Continue reading